27 Sept 2026 · Case #022

Acute mesenteric ischemia

This page works the case through in full, answer included. If you would rather reason it out yourself: Play this case

Diagnosis

Acute mesenteric ischemia

First-line treatment

Urgent revascularization (embolectomy) with resection of non-viable bowel

How the diagnosis is reached

Severe abdominal pain with a soft, benign-feeling abdomen, pain out of proportion to examination findings, is the signature of acute mesenteric ischemia, and it is the reason the diagnosis is so often missed. The visceral peritoneum is not yet involved, so guarding and rebound appear only once the bowel has infarcted transmurally, by which point the operative mortality is dismal. An akinetic apical segment after a recent anterior infarct is a mural thrombus waiting to embolise, and aspirin alone provides no protection; the superior mesenteric artery is a favoured destination because it leaves the aorta at a shallow angle. Raised lactate with a metabolic acidosis and a leukocytosis reflect ischemic tissue, and a modestly raised amylase is a recognised non-specific finding that can misdirect towards pancreatitis. CT angiography is the investigation of choice and must be arterial phase: a routine portal venous study can miss the occlusion entirely. The scan also says how much time is left. The jejunal walls are thin and poorly enhancing, ischaemic but not yet dead, and no free gas means nothing has perforated, which still permits revascularization first: open embolectomy or endovascular retrieval of the clot, then resection of only what is frankly necrotic, with a second-look laparotomy at 24 to 48 hours because marginal bowel declares itself late. Antibiotics, fluid resuscitation and systemic heparin run alongside. Survival turns on time to reperfusion, mortality passing 70% once transmural infarction is established, which is why the decision to operate rests on this scan rather than on waiting for the guarding that would confirm the diagnosis too late to act on it. The other lesson sits in her discharge summary: an akinetic apex after anterior infarction warrants anticoagulation, not aspirin alone.

Key clinical clues

The case in full

1

Presenting complaint

Patient history

A 74-year-old woman has four hours of severe, constant central abdominal pain that began abruptly. She has vomited twice and opened her bowels once. She had a large anterior myocardial infarction six weeks ago.

2

Examination and observations

Physical examination

She is distressed and cannot keep still. The abdomen is soft with only mild generalised tenderness, no guarding and no rebound. Bowel sounds are present.

Measurements
ParameterValue
Heart rate108 bpmRef 60–100
Blood pressure124/72 mmHg
Temperature37.2 °CRef 36.1–37.5
Respiratory rate24 /minRef 12–20
3

Initial bloods

Laboratory results

Bloods and a venous gas are sent.

Measurements
ParameterValue
White blood cells19.4 ×10⁹/LRef 4.5–11.0
Lactate4.2 mmol/LRef 0.5–2.2
pH7.28Ref 7.35–7.45
Bicarbonate17 mmol/LRef 22–28
Amylase142 U/LRef 30–110
4

Response to analgesia

Clinical course

She has received 15 mg of intravenous morphine in total. She still rates the pain 9 out of 10, yet the abdomen remains soft to palpation.

5

Cardiac assessment

Clinical course

The rhythm is sinus. Echocardiography performed after her infarct had reported an akinetic apical segment; she was discharged on aspirin alone.

6

CT angiography

Imaging

Arterial-phase CT of the abdomen is performed. A filling defect sits in the superior mesenteric artery a short distance beyond its origin, with the vessel beyond it opacifying poorly. Several jejunal loops are dilated with thin, poorly enhancing walls, and the adjacent mesenteric fat is hazy. There is no free intraperitoneal gas.